Wednesday, May 28, 2008

It Can't Always Be Great--A Not So Good Article On Retiring Rich



Pretty much the same old stuff from this article about retiring rich--your expenses will stay about the same in retirement, inflation eats away at your money, Medicare doesn't cover all medical expenses, and so on. But read it anyway, mainly for the last sentence.



Retire Rich: Learn From Someone Who Did



by Walter Updegrave/Money Magazine



When Henry "Bud" Hebeler was winding down his career at Boeing nearly 20 years ago, he was appalled at the advice he got from retirement planning software.



"The assumptions about returns, inflation, longevity and expenses were highly simplistic," says the 74-year-old Hebeler. With his engineering degrees from MIT and his experience - first as Boeing's chief forecaster and planner and later as president of Boeing Aerospace - Hebeler figured he could do better.



He has. His Web site, AnalyzeNow.com, is a compendium of advice and tools (mostly free) that can help you tackle topics ranging from how to create a retirement budget to whether to buy an annuity.



What distinguishes Hebeler from the typical retirement "expert" is that he combines a strong quantitative background with real-life retirement experience - his own and that of fellow retirees.



Hebeler took time out from his hectic schedule of skiing, golf, travel and running a site to share his thoughts.



Q. What's the most popular misconception about retirement planning?



A. That your spending will drop as you age and you become less active. My father played golf until he was 95. My wife and I are in our seventies and we ski the expert slopes at Park City, Utah.



My friends who have reduced their spending didn't do so because of lack of energy or physical ability. It doesn't take much effort to get into a taxi and go to the theater. They're cutting back because they know they're going to live longer than they thought they would. They spent too much too early and now they're worried about running out.



Q. So what can you do to assure that your money will last?



A. If you have enough savings to live on, consider delaying taking Social Security until full retirement age or even later. Holding off can be especially worthwhile if you have a spouse who didn't work or had a low income, since the higher payment you get by waiting can be passed on to your spouse when you die.



I also think retirees should consider putting some, but not all, of their money in an immediate annuity. Look at inflation-adjusted immediate annuities, since they provide a lifetime income that, like Social Security, goes up with inflation.



Q. How did your work at Boeing influence the advice you give?



A. It made me more conservative. In business you see how often things don't work out as you planned. Projects cost more to complete than you estimated.



The same is true of retirement, but retirement plans seldom call for setting aside reserves for unforeseen events. There are a lot of surprises, usually more bad ones than good.



Q. What kinds of surprises?



A. For one thing, your expenses are likely to be very different in retirement than during your career. Things that were probably covered by your company insurance - dental work, vision care, a variety of medical tests - typically aren't paid for by Medicare. My hearing aids alone cost $6,000, which wasn't covered at all.



People also don't anticipate the impact of inflation. In the first 10 years of my retirement, the purchasing power of my company pension declined by 30%. And then there are obligations people rarely plan for, such as having to help parents or adult children who are struggling financially.



Q. If you could advise people to do just one thing to improve their retirement prospects, what would it be?



A. People who aren't retired need to know how much to save. My father used to tell me that you should always save at least 10% of your income.



That's more like 15% to 20% today because you're less likely to have a pension.





Monday, May 26, 2008

The things people say



Read the following statements:


“We paid cash for our car.”


“We paid off all our credit cards last week.”


“We're committed to not borrowing money.”


“We're sending our kids to college because we think it's the right thing to do.”


“We can afford this great new house in the suburbs with 4 bedrooms, 3 baths, and a 3 car garage.”


They all sound pretty good, right? Until you hear the rest of the story.


“We paid cash for our car” — When what they really mean is that they brought in a check for the full amount (that they got from a credit union loan) to the car dealer.


“We paid off all our credit cards last week.” — but now we have a huge second mortgage, along with the ability to charge those cards right back up again.


“We're committed to not borrowing money.” — We'll just take out a home equity loan instead, because somehow that doesn't “count”.


“We're sending our kids to college because we think it's the right thing to do.” — We've taken out loans and put off funding our retirement to do so, so the kids can mortgage their lives later to help take care of us when social security isn't enough.


“We can afford this great new house in the suburbs with 4 bedrooms, 3 baths, and a 3 car garage.” — We qualify for the loan, so we must be able to afford it. The mortgage company wouldn't lend us more money than we can afford to pay back.


The thing is, people don't seem to realize that their actions are different than their words. There's a disconnect there that they're not even aware of. And I speak from experience, because I “paid cash for a car” by getting a loan from the credit union. It wasn't until years later that it hit me — duh! Just because I gave the car dealer cash did not mean that I paid cash. I borrowed the money!


Paying cash is when you save up first. Paying off your credit cards is when you scrimp and focus for months on end. Not borrowing money means you don't borrow money from anyone, including yourself. The only way to “take out equity” without borrowing money is to sell your house. You're not doing your kids a favor by sending them to college and decimating your own financial future in the process. You can afford a house when you have an emergency fund and enough money to pay all your bills each month with plenty left over. (And retirement is a bill from my perspective.) It doesn't matter what the mortgage company tells you.



Now is the time for the twiddling of thumbs



It seems like the days right before the 15th, when I get the bulk of the money and can start making payouts and transferring money and ordering cards, are longer than other days. The 15th is always a busy day for me - all the cards get ordered, and all the checks are written. So I'm looking forward to that.

Unfortunately, the other thing that goes on just before payouts are reversals - usually though if I don't feel that the member did anything wrong, I don't reverse the member's credit. So far this month I have gotten at least 10 Foreclosusre.com reversals and 4 Advertising Web Service reversals, and lots of CallWave signups were put "under review".. hopefully there won't be too many more reversals, but the bulk happen between now and the 14th, when the invoice is finalized.

Sunday, May 25, 2008

Cindy McCain relents, releases tax info



Cindy "Mrs. GOP Presidential Nominee John" McCain today did what she previously vowed she would never do: make her tax returns public.



Cindy_mccain
The wealthy heiress of a large Arizona beer distributorship had come under attack for keeping her tax data private. Critics said it
reflected poorly on her husband's ostensible commitment to government transparency.



The McCain campaign made public only his wife's 2006 Form 1040, not any supporting schedules or documents.



On that form, she listed itemized deductions of nearly
$570,000, with about $4.5 million in income from partnerships, trusts
and rental real estate, and another $743,000-plus from capital
gains.



And like a lot of folks, she overpaid. Her refund, however, was much larger: almost $300,000.



The McCains routinely send the IRS two 1040s under the married-filing-separate status. He released his 2007 return in April (blogged about here).



Click here to see Mrs. McCain's 2006 Form 1040, courtesy of Tax Analysts' Tax History Project. That site also has tax info on the McCain Family Foundation for the 2006 and 2007 tax years.



You also can read about other candidate returns, as well as those of Dubya and Dick, in this previous blog item.



McCain's week that was: It's been a, shall we say, interesting week for McCain, who has wrapped up the Republican nomination, what with some of his campaign staff departing, of their own volition and/or being asked to do so, because of lobbying connections.



Then came the unexpected release of Cindy McCain's tax information on the heels of the 71-year-old candidate's medical records.



Saturday, May 24, 2008

Pottery Barn credit card bonus



Whilst perusing the latest Pottery Barn catalog, I noted that the fine print of their credit card bonus program is actually pretty sweet. If you spend $750 during the six-month "program cycle" (which appears to be the first six months of the year, and the second six months) you get a $50 gift certificate to Pottery Barn. Plus, if you spend $100 in the first month, you get a 5% rebate certificate which you could use to make the gift cards go farther. If I spent $750 on my American Express card, I'd only earn $7.50 in gift certificates, so that seems like a good deal to me. To totally dork out, $100 in gift certificates just for spending $1500 with the card (and it doesn't stipulate anything about balances, so you could pay it off right away) gets you a 6.6% return on your money. If you don't want to shop at Pottery Barn, you could sell the gift certificates on eBay or get 70% of value without hassle at GiftCardBuyBack.com or a similar site. (Most of the time eBay'ed gift certificates will get at least 85-90% of value, but it's more time-consuming and you have to pay fees.) I'm probably going to do some credit card arbitraging once my current 0% deal expires and I pay it off, so I'll apply for this one too and get my free gift card.

Details: http://www.potterybarn.com/cust/ccsplash/cust.cfm?cmtype=fnav

Reader questions answered: Saving for a Condo



Random reader question time!

Today's super fab question comes from fellow Chicagoan Aideen, who asks:

"I love you website! I am 26 and a former NYer who moved to the windy city. I try to budget and am doing an okay job of it. Do you have any posts on the best ways to save for buying a condo or house. Is socking away money in a savings account the best way or should I invest the money. i'd love to know what other people do."


That's a great question, Aideen. And since I am in the same boat as you, I'm probably not the best person to answer your question. But I am totally curious, so I asked someone who's a little more credentialed on finance - Eric Brotman, CFP, CLU, MSFS, and president of Brotman Financial Group, Inc. - to help us out. Here's what he said:

A: "Where to save for a first home is largely dependant on the amount of time it will take someone to put together the amount needed for a down payment and closing costs.

Normally, the best option is in a money market account, as they tend to pay a higher rate of interest than a traditional savings account. There are several good online options, including ING Direct and HSBC. (Budgeting Babe note: This is what I'm doing, and I'm at Emigrant Direct.)

Another option is a certificate of deposit, with one caveat. The CD must either have no penalty for accessing the funds before maturity, or a maturity date must be selected which is in advance of the anticipated home purchase.

Investing the money for a first home is only a reasonable idea if the time-horizon is at least two years out, and if that is the case, a moderate allocation portfolio with low transaction expenses would make the most sense. First-time home buyers can also access their Roth IRA for up to $10,000 towards the purchase. Checking with a CPA or tax advisor to see if someone is eligible for a Roth IRA is a good first step. It will provide tax-favored growth while the savings/investments are being accumulated, but not everyone is eligible."

Eric Brotman is President of Brotman Financial Group, Inc., an independent financial planning firm specializing in wealth creation, preservation, and distribution. Mr. Brotman began his financial planning practice in Baltimore in 1994, and founded Brotman Financial Group in 2003. He provides investment, retirement, estate, insurance, and business planning for professionals, executives, and business owners. Mr. Brotman's clients benefit from his technical expertise, extraordinary client service, and a knowledgeable team of insurance and investment specialists.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

As a side note, Aideen, I was tracking with Eric's answer until he threw out the term "moderate allocation portfolio." I looked online and determined he means that if you choose to invest in a mutual fund or group of stocks, pick one that's not too high risk. You don't want to lose your downpayment fund when you're three years away from buying a house! (If you like this moderate risk option, a lot of people on my site have said that Vanguard is a good place to start investing because it has really low transaction fees.)

I got kind of lost during the Roth IRA part, so I appreciated that he mentioned seeing a professional. I heard that borrowing against yourself is pretty common, but I wasn't sure it was recommended by financial professionals. I'm sure peeps will write in the comments about it. If you have an answer, let us know! I'll also go back to Eric and ask him if that's risky or recommended if you're eligible.



Wednesday, May 21, 2008

How a Bank in Colombia could be the Sleeper Stock of 2008






A few years ago, anyone that mentioned investing in Colombia would likely draw laughs or skepticism, especially from the general populous, but for those looking for the next frontier of BRIC-type growth opportunities, Colombia is at the top of the list. Under Uribe, the country has started to emerge from the veil of kidnappings and corruption to recognition that Colombia is a real player in the world economy.










The case for Colombia:





Free Trade Agreement:

Currently, there is much consternation and debate over the proposed Free Trade Agreement with Colombia. As usual with our disingenuous politicians, this is much ado about nothing and it comes down to pandering and politicking. Some little-known facts are that the U.S. has actually been engaged in free trade with Colombia for several years, but on a one-way basis only. As an incentive to allow Colombia to prosper by trading with the US, the expectation was that this opportunity would allow Colombia to fight the drug cartels, and this effort seems to have been successful, given recent results. Since the 1990's and without interruption, a can of coffee or a banana sold into the U.S. from Colombia has entered duty-free with no tariffs, while a tractor or bottle of soda made in the U.S. and sold into Colombia has faced a tariff of anywhere from 10-20%. Without going off on a political or economic rant, it's generally accepted by any economist worth their salt that the benefits of free trade greatly outweigh any negative consequences on an aggregate basis...the theory of competitive advantage, documented cases of free trade with Mexico, etc...Unfortunately, Congress recently scuttled the Colombian Free Trade Agreement, but in time, logic will prevail and this FTA will come to pass and Columbia will reap benefits beyond those of its existing strengths.


It's the Economy Stupid!


Colombia's economy has experienced positive growth over the past several years including 6.5% GDP growth in 2007. The economy is booming due to the government's ability to reduce public debt levels, shift to an export-oriented economy, reign in crime, and our favorite development of the decade: high commodity prices. While the unemployment rate stands at about 10%, that's no different than a typical level in Western Europe of late (9% in Germany, 8% in France). The primary risk facing the local economy is concern over continued failure of the US Congress to approve the FTA.



How to invest in Colombia:



As it stands now, you have only one option and it's a good one: Banco de Colombia (BIC). While the shares are up 3500% since late 2001 and it's unlikely to see another 34x return any time soon, can the stock outperform the US and emerging market indices? Surely. It has continued to do so this year as evidenced by the following chart. Note the 40% return for CIB vs. 20% for EEM, the Emerging Markets ETF, followed by the dismal -7% return for the S&P500 during the prior 1 year period.








Banco de Colombia Analysis:

Analyst Coverage: The shares have virtually no analyst coverage and there are rarely news items published aside from company filings. As of now, there are only 2 analysts on the stock and they are both positive on the stock with a "buy" and an "outperform". The past two actions in 2005 were upgrades and newly initiated coverage in 2006 was "outperform".


Beta: Interestingly, even given the massive runup over the years, the Beta for the stock is less than 1, at .89, so it's not as risky a proposition as you might envision.

Dividend: The stock sports a 2.9% dividend, which is OK for a bank stock.


Earnings: BIC recently reported earnings of Ps. 425.0 billion for the first four months increasing 56.6% as compared to the same period of 2007. It's difficult to gauge earnings vs. street consensus with virtually no coverage from the street, but judging by the continued ascent in share prices of late, the smart money likes what they're seeing. The shares are slightly off the all-time high of $44 per share at $40 per share.



Outlook: Given the increase in the standard of living and continued strong GDP growth in Colombia, as well as decreasing inflation, I expect the stock to continue to perform well in spite of a deferral on the FTA. In the event the FTA comes to pass in the future, expect even bigger things from Banco de Colombia.

Disclosure: The Everyday Finance portfolio currently has no position in CIB and does not intend on purchasing shares during the next 5 trading days.






Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Write-Offs: 05.19.08



$$$ Deals: The Blockbuster Is Back

In our M&A Roundup for the week ended May 18, four deals top $2.5 billion, with HP-EDS and the sale of defense contractor DRS topping the list. [CFO.com]



$$$ Gotti loan shark gets shaken down in USA Commercial Mortgage bankruptcy [TheDeal]



$$$ Brinks Co. (BCO) [WallStrip]



Apparently, It Pays to Be Naughty - Vice Fund vs. Socially Responsible Fund





A comparison of Vice Fund vs. Socially Responsible Fund






I heard an anecdote contrasting these funds on Bloomberg on my nifty Sirius Satellite radio and thought I'd check out how the angel on the left shoulder fares against the devil on the right. Yes, there is actually a fund called the Vice Fund, ticker VICEX, that invests in none other than tobacco, casinos, military and alcohol companies. As you may have heard, "socially responsible" investments are all the rage now as well, with the most notable fund being the Neuberger Berman Socially Responsible Investment fund NBSRX.



Interestingly, in the year ago period, the Vice Fund beats both the Socially Responsible Fund AND the S&P500 at 3% up for Vice vs. a loss of 4-5% for the benchmarks.





Next, check out the 5 year view, as the Vice Fund completely trounces both benchmarks at 144% for Vice vs. less than 60% for the benchmarks:








Some notables:


  • Vice Fund gets a 5 star Morningstar rating vs. 4 for Socially Responsible
  • Vice Fund has a higher expense ratio at 1.75% vs. .9%

Vice Fund Top 10 Holdings:


Altria Group Inc. (MO)
9.07%

Carolina Group (CG)
7.15%

MGM Mirage, Inc. (MGM)
5.63%

International Game Tech. (IGT)
5.34%

Diageo PLC ADR (DEO)
5.26%

British American Tobacco PLC ADR (BTI)
4.95%

Boeing Company (BA)
4.81%

InBev (INB)
4.33%

Wynn Resorts, Ltd. (WYNN)
4.13%

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)
3.97%





Socially Responsible Fund Top 10 Holdings:


Comcast Corporation (CMCSK)
4.39%

E.W. Scripps Company (SSP)
4.39%

Anixter International (AXE)
4.13%

Altera Corp. (ALTR)
3.98%

Danaher Corporation (DHR)
3.76%

Willis Group Holdings, Ltd. (WSH)
3.74%

UnitedHealth Group, Inc. (UNH)
3.60%

Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK)
3.54%

American Express Company (AXP)
3.32%

BG Grp (BG.)
3.25%


I found the top holding of Comcast in a Socially Responsible Fund to be somewhat ironic, given that they are evil, anti-customer service monopolists (can you tell I have trouble with my cable and internet service?). However, I'm sure they've vetted all their holdings to ensure there are no dealings with the Sudan, profiting from blood diamond trade, etc. In conclusion, let your conscience be your guide at your portfolio's peril.

Monday, May 19, 2008

Theme and Gleam



I've moved the new theme for Aridni out of the sandbox and onto the main page.? While this isn't exactly the final product, I wanted to get it launched as soon as possible.? There will be a couple smaller changes with some color tweaking and minor spacing issues resolved.? As well as some ‘big ticket' changes.? Primarily with the image on the top left, I'm not liking the weird moon looking shape.


On the right, there is a new feature for Aridni called ‘Bookit!'? With that you will be able to see what books we most recently reviewed and read.


Well, that's all the news for right now.? Have a good day.


Todd




Sunday, May 18, 2008

Synthetic Options on Oil for Profit - Price Unsustainable at Current Levels: Up or Down is the Question



Oil Prices at $114 unsustainable...or is this just a stopping point to $150 per barrel?


Utilizing Synthetic Options to profit on a downward trend with no money down







"The price of oil can't move any higher" - How many times have you heard that one before? At $60 per barrel, then at $80, then at $100. Well, there will be a near term top and I believe we've hit it. Given that oil is denominated in US Dollar terms, our weakening economy's certainly given a boost to the price of oil, but even in terms of stronger currencies, oil is at or approaching historical highs in real terms.

Global Recession - The Party's Over

The US and hence, the global economy is teetering on recession (we're not as "de-coupled" as the talking heads would have you believe as evidenced by the crash of the emerging markets with the US indices). If history and logic are any barometer, as the global slowdown ensues, demand for goods and services declines, leading to a reduction in overall consumption and hence oil consumption. This decline in oil demand/consumption complex lowers the price of oil to the point that it is no longer as profitable to extract it and companies start to invest capital in other sources of energy (i.e. how the tar sands and green energy sectors were born) and the whole cycle repeats itself again as economies return to robust growth and the lack of capacity creates a pinch point for oil production. To think that oil at these prices is sustainable is to assume that US home prices would continue to climb 10%+ for years to come and the internet bubble would never burst. That's not to say oil is due for a precipitous decline (don't miss the poll on the left), but markets overreact and with commodities in general, we're clearly seeing that. Gold and other metals have retreated; why is oil at new highs?



Counter Argument - Gold to $150 by Summer

You haven't seen anything yet. As Chavez continues to nationalize oil interests, Nigerian kidnappings present continued supply interruptions and oil pipelines in Iraq remain an Al-Qaeda target, the current prices you're seeing are a mere bump in the road for oil prices. Many industry experts have conceded that the replacement rate of oil by the majors can no longer keep pace with consumption. Some of the top wells in the world have breached their theoretical maximum output rate and will only decline from here.

Oil at over $100 per barrel is the new reality. Why, you might ask? Well, it's just too damn cheap compared to everything else out there and the world's insatiable appetite for oil cannot be quelled. Extracting energy from the tar sands in Canada is a dirty business and only now becoming attractive at these high prices. Solar is terribly expensive and ethanol is the biggest scam pulled on the US public in decades. Notice that the primaries begin in Ohio, where the greatest concentration of farmers benefit from this sham? Until our politicians decide to remove the tariffs on ethanol imports from Brazil, there's no way we'll break our dependence on oil as a primary energy source. In my humble opinion, in the absence of a major attitude adjustment from the economy where 5% of the world's population consumes 25% of the world's energy, nuclear's the only viable option, but "not in my backyard", so you won't see any new plants coming on line any time soon.

A Synthetic What?

A Synthetic Option is a a way to synthetically mimic the return of an underlying stock without actually shelling out any money. How is this possible? On the long side, you can buy a call and sell a put for the same premium and have a net neutral cash outlay in your trading account. If the stock rises, you benefit from the upward movement of the call and the decrease in value of the put and can roughly duplicate ownership of 100 shares of the underlying stock. Of course, if things go the wrong direction, you're on the hook for the downside move. There are variations on a theme here. If you don't want to risk loss for a small move, you can buy and out of the money call and sell an out of the money put and still realize the same net neutral outlay as long as the premiums are equivalent.



Here's an example of the trade I executed today (obviously, I chose the former, not the latter argument and took a net short position on oil, banking on a return of USO to $80 as we've seen twice in the past month):






USO is the ETF that tracks spot price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) light, sweet crude oil and roughly matches the moves in the quoted oil prices you see in the mainstream press. My belief is that we've reached a peak and will not see a move much past $115 per barrel before we see a nice drop like the one that occurred a few weeks ago.



Since USO was valued at 90.8 today when the oil price was $113.4 per barrel, I decided to executed a synthetic option with action at the 5% move level in the May expiry contracts:


I bought 2 USO 86 strike PUT options at 2.20 each

I sold 2 USO 95 strike CALL options at 2.35 each

My net out of pocket cost was zero considering commissions.

Here's how this will play out:




If oil spikes say, 10% to $128 per barrel, USO will move to ~$100. My 95 calls will be $500 out of the money each for a net loss of $1000.

If oil drops 10% to ~$101 per barrel, USO will move to ~$82 per share and the puts will be in the money $400 each for a net gain of $800.

If oil remains range bound and USO is somewhere between $86 and $95 at expiry in May, there is no transaction and both sets of options expire worthless. If trading close to $86, I could sell the put for a small profit based on the remaining time value.

The risk here is obvious, a major spike in oil will trigger a loss. However, given where oil's at now and with only 2 options contracts, I don't face catastrophic loss and I can sleep at night. If this sort of thing does keep you up at night, but you like the prospect of synthetic options, you could always cap your liability by buying an additional 2 out of the money calls at say, $100 to cap your losses to $500 per contract. This insurance somewhat negates the allure of the net neutral play, but that far out of the money, the options are cheaper at ~1.20. I don't recommend this play unless you fully understand your risk-adjusted return and you can handle the maximum liability.

Don't miss the poll in the sidebar this week to register your thoughts on where oil's headed!

For the latest insight into the EverydayFinance Porfolio, click here.

The savings buckets



I've always known that saving money was important. Actually implementing a savings plan and learning to stick to it has taken some time though.


Part of the problem was that I had a narrow view of what savings meant. I thought that it meant money that you tucked away for some future date that would never come. It's hard to get motivated to regularly send money away if you basically believe that you'll never see it again. That's sort of like spending, only without getting anything in return. So it helped when I expanded my definition of savings.


I now look at saving as filling up various buckets for future spending that WILL take place. (I've probably actually gone too far in the other direction by making my definition of savings very broad, but it works for me.) In my case I lump investments in with savings, even though I know that there is a difference between the two. Here are the buckets that I “save money” for, along with a short explanation of them:


1. Retirement - I hope to “retire” early, so I'm hyper-focused on socking away money toward retirement right now. This is especially true because I've only recently begun doing so regularly.


2. Emergencies - My definition of an emergency involves blood or involuntary loss of employment. That's it. I pay a disability insurance premium for this each month too.


3. Repairs & replacements - This bucket is probably more of what most people consider an “emergency”. I consider them inevitabilities though. Car repairs, appliance breakdowns, furniture replacement, and home improvements fall into this category.


4. Mortgage - This is where my husband and I are gathering up money for the future payoff of our mortgage.


5. Escrow - We set aside money each month to use to pay our property taxes and homeowner's insurance instead of having our mortgage company escrow the funds.


6. Non-retirement investments - I'm not really sure why I separate this out mentally, since basically all of my investments will (hopefully) help fund retirement. But these are more speculative things — like tax liens and individual stocks.


7. Education - Unfortunately this is a rather small fund. But I do send a little bit each month to an account that I'll use to help my son fund college.


8. Wants - This is almost exclusively for travel, since that's pretty much what I most enjoy doing.


I don't save for Christmas gifts, mainly because I tend to buy gifts all year around, so I don't need a bucket to collect money for that. I have these buckets “organized” kind of loosely. A few accounts are actually named for their intended purpose (travel, appliances, mortgage, escrow) but most of the rest are more mental divisions. (Except for IRAs and 401(k) accounts.) It works for me. Sometimes it feels like I have no money left when I get done dumping money into the various buckets, but then I realize that I DO have money for exactly what I want to do, when I want to do it. And that's the point of savings.



Saturday, May 17, 2008

The Key To Finding Cheap Car Insurance



The costs of car insurance, as with all things car related, have gone up in recent months for any number of reasons. Car insurance companies give all sorts of reasons for that, and most of them are complete garbage. Although we’ve all been taught to take everything with a pinch of salt, it doesn’t help you when you have to fork out for it after buying a new car! However, if you are with Tesco insurance you can save a lot of money.?


Tesco insurance insurance really can helps its customers in a number of ways. The choice of car insurance products is fantastic so you get the deal you need at the price you want to suit you perfectly. In fact, Tesco insurance can be the answer to your prayers. Obtaining a quote takes but a few minutes and is a decision that you will never regret!



Friday, May 16, 2008

Me And My SEP



So I just set up an SEP-IRA for myself, partially because then I can contribute for last year, and knock a good chunk off the taxes I owe, and because I came across this wonderful bit of logic from Five Cent Nickel:

As I noted above, you can contribute to your SEP-IRA as either the employer, the employee, or both. In the case of the latter, it counts against your annual IRA contribution limit, so it reduces the amount that you can contribute to a traditional or Roth IRA. But in the case of the former, there’s no effect on your annual IRA contribution limit. Thus, it seems that you can use employer contributions to your SEP-IRA as a way of legally exceeding the IRS contribution limits.


Brilliant!

See, an SEP can't be set up as a Roth, but you can still deduct it from your taxes, and you can contribute up to 25% of what your business makes each year. So I can contribute my money to either the SEP or into my workplace accounts, and it doesn't make any difference. This is attractive because depositing into my workplace accounts can't exactly be done when I have a bit of spare cash - I have to fill out a form and hope they process it before my next paycheck. ALSO, I could roll it over into a Roth whenever I pleased, and I'm not limited to waiting until I leave this job. So I could have my 403b, my 457b, my Roth IRA, AND my SEP IRA.. drool. (I'm definitely in the savings-is-addictive club.)

Getting To A Million Bucks



Most people don't get rich because they refuse to start small. Why bother? Just win the lottery. I can't believe people buy lottery tickets but they do. And the ones I see doing so don't look very smart. And they aren't.



The way to get there is simple, well, kind of. Save two times your annual salary and let the power of compound interest take over. Einstein said that compound interest was the eighth wonder of the world and most people think Einstein was, well, an Einstein.



Jonathan Clements gives the details in the following---



How to Save $1 Million for Retirement



The Wall Street Journal Online
By Jonathan Clements


If you're a newly minted college graduate, the $1 million-plus needed for retirement might seem impossibly large.

Feeling discouraged? Try lowering your sights, aiming instead to accumulate savings equal to two times your annual income.

Once you hit that milestone, the financial wind will be at your back -- and reaching your retirement-savings goal should be a breeze.

Breaking through. Suppose you expect eventually to earn $80,000 a year. Looking ahead to retirement, you reckon that -- in addition to Social Security -- you will want maybe $45,000 a year from your portfolio, adjusted for inflation.

To generate that $45,000, you will need a $1 million nest egg, calculated in today's dollars. This assumes that, in retirement, you use a 4.5% annual portfolio-withdrawal rate.

Investment Growth

"People wonder how they will ever accumulate enough money," says Charles Farrell, a financial adviser with Denver's Northstar Investment Advisors. "But what many investors fail to understand is that, once they reach a certain level of assets, most of the savings should come from investment growth."

Mr. Farrell figures the breakthrough occurs at around two times income. Let's say your salary has hit that $80,000, you have amassed $160,000 in savings, you are socking away 12% of your pretax income each month and your investments earn 6% a year.

Over the next 12 months, your $160,000 portfolio would balloon to $179,518, or $19,518 more. Your monthly savings would account for $9,600 of that growth. But the other $9,918 would come from investment gains. In other words, you've got to the crossover point, where the biggest driver of your portfolio's growth is now investment earnings, not the actual dollars you're socking away.

You should, however, keep salting away money. That sacrifice will be handsomely rewarded, as things really start to snowball. Using the assumptions above, your portfolio would soar from $160,000 to more than $418,000 a decade later. True, part of this gain would be lost to inflation. But inflation should also drive up your salary, allowing you to squirrel away more money.

Get Started Now

Getting started. That still leaves the initial task of accumulating two times income.

"It can take people 12 to 15 years," Mr. Farrell says. "The earlier you can start, the better. But if you're close to two times pay by your early 40s, you're probably in pretty good shape."

As you strive to amass that sum, your top priority should be funding your employer's 401(k) plan. In addition to the initial tax deduction and continuing tax deferral, you will likely receive a matching employer contribution, which will help speed your portfolio's progress.

If you can, save outside your employer's plan, by funding a Roth individual retirement account. That won't get you an initial tax deduction, but you will enjoy tax-free growth. A Roth also offers a heap of flexibility. At any time, you can withdraw your contributions -- but not the account's investment earnings -- without any sort of tax hit. That means your Roth could double as an emergency reserve or as your house down-payment fund.

Investment Ideas

Which investments should you buy? Check out broadly diversified no-load funds like AARP Aggressive and Schwab Target 2040, both of which require a $100 initial investment. Until you reach Schwab's $1,000 brokerage-account minimum, you will need to add $100 every month through an automatic investment plan, where money is pulled out of your bank account and invested directly in the fund.

Also consider Fidelity Freedom 2050 and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050. The regular minimum at both funds is $2,500. T. Rowe Price will trim that minimum to $1,000 if you open an IRA and waive the minimum entirely if you sign up for a $50-a-month automatic-investment plan. Similarly, at Fidelity Freedom 2050, you can sidestep the minimum if you agree to invest $200 a month through Fidelity's SimpleStart IRA program.